‎By Oluwatobiloba Gideon Oludayomi
‎I have interacted with too many broken hearted people to keep quiet about this one. And I have learnt that love alone was never designed to carry a relationship. Love is the engine, yes. But vision is the road. Without a road, even the strongest engine will only spin in one place, burning fuel, going nowhere.
‎Let me be clear from the start. Vision does not have to be grand. It does not have to sound like a TED talk or read like a five year strategic plan. Vision can be as simple as, "I want us to own a small piece of land before we are forty." Or, "I want our home to be a place where people feel safe." Or even, "I want to raise children who know how to think, not just children who know how to obey." Simple. Clear. Alive. That is all vision requires. What it cannot survive without is direction.
‎Here is what nobody tells young couples in church halls and engagement parties. A relationship without vision is not neutral. It is not simply calm and unremarkable. It is dangerous. Because where there is no vision, something else quietly moves in to fill the space. And that something is usually unrealistic expectation.
‎When two people do not know where they are going together, they begin to imagine where they think they should be going. And imagination, left unchecked, becomes entitlement. She imagines a certain lifestyle because her vision was never spoken, only assumed. He imagines a certain kind of peace because he never sat down to define what peace would actually require from him. Both are now living inside private movies, and calling it a shared life.
‎Proverbs puts it plainly. Where there is no vision, the people perish. Some translations say the people cast off restraint. I find that translation particularly honest, because that is exactly what happens in love without direction. Restraint disappears. Patience disappears. Two people start pulling in different directions, each one certain they are the reasonable one, each one wondering why the other refuses to understand something that was, quite frankly, never explained.
‎I have watched people confuse attraction with alignment. Chemistry can make you enjoy a person's company. It cannot make you agree on how many children to have, where to live, how to handle money, or what to do when either of you fails. Chemistry is the spark. Vision is the architecture. You cannot live inside a spark. You need a structure that can hold weight, including the weight of disappointment, delay, and change.
‎This is where lived experience has taught me something painful and useful. Many relationships do not collapse because love ran out. They collapse because two people never built anything to stand on. They were simply feeling their way through each day, hoping the feeling would somehow organize itself into a future. Feelings are wonderful companions but they make terrible architects.
‎Loving someone without vision will cost you time you cannot recover. It will cost you the version of yourself that could have grown faster with clearer direction. It will cost you peace, because uncertainty breeds anxiety, and anxiety breeds accusation. And eventually, if left unaddressed, it will cost you the relationship itself, because people rarely leave love. They leave confusion dressed up as love.
‎You are not just choosing a person. You are choosing a direction. If the direction is unclear, the person, however wonderful, will eventually feel like a burden rather than a partner. Not because they changed. But because the absence of a shared destination makes every disagreement feel like a referendum on the whole relationship.
‎Vision requires conversation before commitment, not after. It requires two people sitting down, sometimes uncomfortably, to say out loud what they want their life to look like in five years, in ten years, and even at the end. It requires honesty about finances, about faith, about family expectations, about the kind of home you are both trying to build. This is not romantic in the Nollywood sense. But it is the most romantic thing you will ever do, because it protects the love you claim to have.
‎The scripture again offers wisdom here. Amos asked a simple but piercing question. Can two walk together unless they are agreed. That question is not about personality compatibility. It is about direction. You can love someone deeply and still be walking toward completely different destinations. Love does not automatically create agreement. Agreement has to be built, deliberately, patiently, honestly.
‎Effort without direction eventually turns into exhaustion. And exhausted love, however sincere, struggles to survive.
‎If I could speak to my younger self, or to any young person reading this today, I would say this. Do not marry potential. Marry direction. Potential is exciting, but potential without a defined vision is simply a beautiful uncertainty. And uncertainty, no matter how beautiful, cannot raise children, cannot pay bills, cannot carry two people through the inevitable seasons of hardship that every relationship will face.
‎So here is what I want you to do after reading this. Sit with your partner, or sit with yourself if you are single, and ask honestly. Do we know where we are going. Not vaguely. Not romantically. Specifically. Because clarity is not the enemy of love. Clarity is what protects it.
‎What is one vision you have never spoken out loud to your partner, or one you wish someone had asked you to define before you said yes. I would genuinely love to read your thoughts in the comments. Your story might be exactly what someone else needs to read today.
‎* * *
‎Oluwatobiloba Gideon Oludayomi is a practical writer, a scripture addict, and a versatile entrepreneur building wealth through agriculture, real estate, and enterprise. He writes on faith, business systems, personal development, mindset re-engineering, and the Nigerian condition. He is the Convener of the Dominion Guild Network, an ecosystem of high value individuals, young and determined to becoming an empowered generation. He is also the author of "Build It to Last", "I Thought I Married a Wife" (a novel), and "Practical Love".